From the Illustrators Partnership: Google Prevails in Copyright Lawsuit ©

Originally posted Friday, October 16, 2015 by the Illustrators Partnership of America (IPA). The following is courtesy of IPA.

Next Stop: Supreme Court
How will outcome affect artists?

 

© 2015 Don Arday.

Four years ago the Google Book Search Settlement was thrown out of court on the grounds that neither party to the agreement had legal standing to carve up the exclusive rights of the world's authors. In his ruling, Judge Denny Chin wrote that it was for Congress, not the courts, to decide on the future of copyright law.

Since then, however, the courts have been chipping away at copyright, expanding the scope of what's called "fair use," that is, how much someone can use of your work without your permission. 

Today an appeals court ruled in Google's favor, according to an online article in Fortune.

"It's finally over. An appeals court confirmed that Google's scanning of more than 20 million books counts as fair use.

"It's been ten years since authors first sued Google over the decision to scan millions of books, but now an appeals court appears to have confirmed once and for all the scanning did not violate copyright law."

To be clear, this does NOT directly affect the new orphan works legislation currently being considered by Congress. But it's a safe bet that corporation lobbyists will use it to argue that the decision paves the way for it:

"Friday's appeals court ruling is significant because it clears the legal uncertainty that has been hanging over Google for a decade, and also because it provides more guidance on what qualifies as fair use in a digital age.

"In particular, the court states on several occasions how copyright law represents a balance between authors and the public, and points out how many forms of fair use are partly commercial." [Emphasis added.]

The Authors Guild has announced that it plans to appeal to the Supreme Court: 

"We are disheartened that the court was unable to comprehend the grave impact that this decision, if left standing, could have on copyright incentives and, ultimately, our literary heritage. We trust that the Supreme Court will see fit to correct the Second Circuit's reductive understanding of fair use, and to recognize Google's seizure of property as a serious threat to writers and their livelihoods, one which will affect the depth, resilience and vitality of our intellectual culture."

Thanks to all of you who wrote the Copyright Office this summer, and let's all buckle our seatbelts. We could be in for a bumpy ride.  

Letters submitted by Illustrators Partnership and ASIP can be read on our Orphan Works Blog 

IPA Comment: Copyright Protection for Certain Visual Works
IPA Reply Comment
ASIP Reply Comment 

ASIP Comment: Mass Digitization and Extended Collective Licensing 

-- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner 

    for the Board of the Illustrators Partnership

Please post or forward this artist alert to any interested party.